RehRomano to Vancouver · 1 year agoOpinion: Time to double down on SkyTrain extensions in Vancouver, not Langleydailyhive.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down14
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: Time to double down on SkyTrain extensions in Vancouver, not Langleydailyhive.comRehRomano to Vancouver · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarezephyrekslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoAt Singaporean density, it could easily work. Sprawl won’t fix congestion.
minus-squareNathanielThomaslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·1 year agoNobody wants Singaporean density
minus-squarezephyrekslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoTell that to people from Singapore, Tokyo, Beijing, London, Paris… Ah bugger.
minus-squareNathanielThomaslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoIf people want to live with 10 million other people in overpriced and overcrowded cities that’s really their deranged fetish but I personally think Canada was better off with a smaller population
minus-squarezephyrekslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe lack of growth in the Canadian economy can be attributed directly to urban developmental practices.
minus-squareNogami@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoExactly. Who wants to live in a tiny box?
At Singaporean density, it could easily work. Sprawl won’t fix congestion.
Nobody wants Singaporean density
Tell that to people from Singapore, Tokyo, Beijing, London, Paris… Ah bugger.
If people want to live with 10 million other people in overpriced and overcrowded cities that’s really their deranged fetish but I personally think Canada was better off with a smaller population
The lack of growth in the Canadian economy can be attributed directly to urban developmental practices.
Exactly. Who wants to live in a tiny box?
There is a middle ground.