• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    One note in there was “including a preservation fee paid to China”. It doesn’t say how much of the €1.5 million a year amount was that cost though.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The way I read it (specifically the Reuters link provided elsewhere), it’s the total cost of upkeep, not just any “rent” to China. The fact they’re on loan makes them an easy target for sending elsewhere to cut costs. Other animals might not have anywhere quite so easy to go back to.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        in the facility where the animals live and faced annual costs of 1.5 million euros for their upkeep, including a preservation fee paid to China

        That’s straight from the Reuters article. It mentions it includes a fee

        • palordrolap@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          My use of “rent” in quotes was not to imply that no payment was being made, but that “rent” isn’t quite the right word in that context.

          Sorry for the confusion.