silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agoFirst Scorched, Then Soaked: Weather Whiplash Confounds Farmerswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10
arrow-up119arrow-down1external-linkFirst Scorched, Then Soaked: Weather Whiplash Confounds Farmerswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareEmpiricism@sustainability.masto.hostlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year ago@silence7 “Confounds Farmers”? Hadn’t they heard of climate change?
minus-squarecerement@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year ago heard of, yes acknowledge, no comprehend, no
minus-squareEmpiricism@sustainability.masto.hostlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year ago@cerement Of course “farmers” covers a broad demographic (a spectrum). But yes, overall: heard of, yes acknowledge, no comprehend, no Is a fair assessment. Though, l’d add “heard of yes, but, excuses” (some justifiable, many, simply excuses to not change their mono-industrial farming as usual methods)
@silence7
“Confounds Farmers”?
Hadn’t they heard of climate change?
@cerement
Of course “farmers” covers a broad demographic (a spectrum). But yes, overall:
heard of, yes
acknowledge, no
comprehend, no
Is a fair assessment.
Though, l’d add “heard of yes, but, excuses” (some justifiable, many, simply excuses to not change their mono-industrial farming as usual methods)