• smooth_tea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No what I said is that them being idiots doesn’t excuse you being an idiot as well.

    If public enemy number 1 in a banana republic gets 98% of the votes and people state the people’s favorite actually won (implying voter fraud), you’re saying the people’s favorite can’t run again because people stated he won?

    That is your logic right there. And you don’t evaluate your stupidity because Trump is an incredibly easy target so nothing you say should be scrutinized. I think that’s stupid and detrimental and you should hold yourself to a better standard instead of simply throwing out silly statements aimed at easy targets.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, I’m saying that, based on their claim that he won, he can’t run again.

      You seem to think I believe he won. He didn’t. Therefore he can run again.

      But I suppose realizing that would make it harder for you to insult me.

      • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        We’re back to square one, I argued what was wrong with your logic in that statement when you first posted it and you came back with an insult and no attempt to clarify, and now you simply repeat it. Don’t come crying now.