The Supreme Court is reinstating a regulation aimed at reining in the proliferation of ghost guns, firearms without serial numbers that have been turning up at crime scenes across the nation in increasing numbers.

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The court on Tuesday voted 5-4 to put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in Texas that invalidated the Biden administration’s regulation of ghost gun kits. The regulation will be in effect while the administration appeals the ruling to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans — and potentially the Supreme Court.

    Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined with the court’s three liberal members to form the majority. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas would have kept the regulation on hold during the appeals process. Neither side provided an explanation.

  • sudo22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hopefully SCOTUS makes the right decision once they acrltually review the case. The ATF has no right to decide themselves that 80% kits are suddenly illegal.

  • pepperprepper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    This just says they can’t sell 80%s and the rest of a firearm in the same shopping cart. Doesn’t seem like much of a restriction to home makers.

  • Efwis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Well that’s going to pass off a lot of Texans and other gun nuts, which I pretty much one and the same.

    • _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Gun nut here: Not a Texan and also not really pissed off about this. I also think it probably won’t make much of a difference and home-made firearms have been around for well over 100 years so if someone really wants to make one and doesn’t care about regulations, they’re just going to make one anyways.

      • Efwis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree, what I classify as a gun but is someone who needs 30 different rifles and more than one handgun, dont hunt and is afraid they will be attacked by anyone if they don’t have one or more guns on their person at one time, just to clarify.

        I’m not anti-gun, I just don’t see a need for so many guns in one household whether legal or not. I honestly don’t think ghost guns and kits should be regulated some how, and serial numbers help obtain this

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Do you get equally upset my people that collect knives, old tools, or cars?

          All of those can be dangerous too.

          • fathog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ah yes, nobody talks about the daily news of someone killing dozens of people with knives, old tools, and/or cars! We should absolutely not worry about guns while these clearly significantly more dangerous weapons are allowed to proliferate so easily!

            • Zron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              According to the cdc, about 42,000 people died from car accidents.

              In 2021, the worst year for gun deaths, about 48,000 people died from guns.

              So yes, cars are just about as Dangerous as guns.

              We need to ban all these maniacs from owning full automatic transmission vehicles.

          • Efwis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, and I’m not upset. I just think it’s excessive to think you need that many guns for 2-4 people. I saw one gentleman that had an arsenal of 250 guns and 90 handguns in the guise of self defense, for one person. He carried 3 ar-15’s in his car at all times and walked around with 4 handguns 2 on h hi is hip and one on each leg in ankle holsters. His gun belt carried 8 magazines at all times.

            If you ask me that’s stupid, if he got into a gunfight with someone he might have enough time to use 2 or 3 shots off one gun. Sorry but that does not put the odds in your favor.

          • Efwis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, and I’m not upset. I just think it’s excessive to think you need that many guns for 2-4 people. I saw one gentleman that had an arsenal of 250 guns and 90 handguns in the guise of self defense, for one person. He carried 3 ar-15’s in his car at all times and walked around with 4 handguns 2 on h hi is hip and one on each leg in ankle holsters. His gun belt carried 8 magazines at all times.

            If you ask me that’s stupid, if he got into a gunfight with someone he might have enough time to use 2 or 3 shots off one gun. Sorry but that does not put the odds in your favor.