cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/13145612

(edit) Would someone please ship some counterfeit money through there and get it confiscated, so the police can then be investigated for spending counterfeit money?

  • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    The institute for justice FIRE and a couple other major civil rights organizations have been working working on getting civil forfeiture over turned and made unconstitutional for decades now

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      for decades now

      When obvious criminal activity requires decades to solve you should kind of take the hint…

    • activistPnk@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      IIRC, New Mexico banned civil forfeiture. But the cops kept doing it anyway. So a law change is not enough… enforcement is also needed. Yes, against the police, sadly enough.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They can still perform asset forfeiture if they believe there is criminal probability. So they only need to have weak evidence criminal activity is at issue, to search, and confiscate things. Since this is the majority of what they did already, it didn’t do too much. This was mostly an attempt, by the state DA, to get ahead of the movement against asset forfeiture. A way for them to keep doing what they are doing, while paying lip service to civil rights. However their argument didn’t work as all forms of asset forfeiture are in the sights. They hoped having more cause, and a stricter documentation, would give them the leeway needed, but the case being brought is that if the item isn’t specifically evidence, it can’t be seized, if it is evidence it can’t kept, or there are other laws determining what is to be done when a conviction is had. So FIRE has said while it is nice it is a little more strict there, it is in no way outside of the scope of their lawsuits.