• ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s a case against the government. If it hurts the Dems, the SC might be more interested in it. In all likelihood, they would be looking ahead to cases where they wouldn’t want to give precedent to climate protections but just a flippant remark highlighting the corruption of the SC.