(Bloomberg) -- Major Democratic donors on Wall Street are increasingly pushing Kamala Harris’ team to replace top regulators Lina Khan and Gary Gensler if the vice president wins in November.Most Read from BloombergWorld's Second Tallest Tower Spurs Debate About Who Needs ItThe Plan for the World’s Most Ambitious Skyscraper RenovationUC Berkeley Gives Transfer Students a Purpose-Built Home on CampusRome May Start Charging Entry to the Trevi FountainMadrid to Ban E-Scooter Rentals, Following Lead
  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
    13·
    11 days ago

    You want Kamala to come out and say she’ll stop selling bombs to Israel? Fine, she’ll get a defeat

    I think you overestimate single-issue pro-genocide voters.

    Again, in the end you have two options in the USA and one would gladly see Gaza be wiped out completely

    I have two options what would gladly see Gaza wiped out completely. I’m upset about that. I know why you aren’t.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      11·
      11 days ago

      You interpret my analysis of their political strategy as me supporting the genocide happening right now, that’s very insulting.

      You truly need to take a step back, you’re clearly too emotional to have this conversation.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        11 days ago

        You truly need to take a step back, you’re clearly too emotional to have this conversation.

        Imagine being emotional about genocide.

        You want me to believe that you dispassionately weighed the evidence and monstrous cold logic dictated that continuing to sell weapons so that genocide can flourish was the correct decision. I don’t buy it. I think you started from a conclusion you liked and worked your way backwards.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          11·
          11 days ago

          You want to have a conversation about if it’s right or wrong to send bombs to Israel when this conversation is about the political strategy behind the decision to continue to mention support for Israel during the campaign, they’re two separate discussions and you’re clearly unable to distinguish between the two.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              11·
              10 days ago

              https://sh.itjust.works/comment/13764678

              The conversation was about her stance and the impact on her chance to get elected from the get go, not on if what’s happening in Palestine is right or wrong (it is wrong, it’s not the subject of the conversation even if you try to make it be about that).

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  11·
                  10 days ago

                  If you don’t want to have the conversation this was about in the first place why did you bother replying at all? You’re the interloper here, not me.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    11·
                    10 days ago

                    Genocide is wrong. You support it anyway and come up with bullshit justifications to make yourself feel better about the outcome.