good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

  • Linktank@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah because there’s definitely no voter suppression going on already. Let’s make sure the dregs of society can share their dumbass opinions when things come to a general vote.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s a false equivalence. Building up society as a whole is better than trying to determine “the most relevant” voices.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I suspect the people who would set this test would be the exact opposite of the people you want to set this test, in more than 50% of the seats.