I’m less concerned about the SC and more concerned with random acts terrorism that will come with a decisive loss. They will only hear the case if it’s close and sometimes it seems like Trump is trying to lose.
I’m concerned with how there are about three different terrifyingly-viable ways for Trump to end up with the Presidency that don’t involve getting ≥270 Electoral College votes.
Bush v. Gore 2.0
Jan 6 2.0
Having MAGAs disrupt vote certifications in enough states that neither candidate gets to 270 and the election is thrown to a “one state, one vote” poll in the House.
I’m less concerned about the SC and more concerned with random acts terrorism that will come with a decisive loss. They will only hear the case if it’s close and sometimes it seems like Trump is trying to lose.
I’m concerned with how there are about three different terrifyingly-viable ways for Trump to end up with the Presidency that don’t involve getting ≥270 Electoral College votes.