• Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Too bad we’ll never get it. What’s the incentive for pharma companies to develop a cheap and safe alternative to their poison?

    This will never go beyond trials.

    • solo@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I suppose this depends on where one lives. For the US, I think psilocybin assisted therapy is available in Oregon, Colorado and a in couple of places in California. In Australia it is already legal since 2023.

      Apart from that there are several countries in the world where psilocybin can be bought legally. I don’t know for sure, but I would assume one could find there some physicians exercising this sort of therapy.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s the incentive for pharma companies to develop a cheap and safe alternative to their poison?

      The exclusive rights to get their product administered in hospitals, carried by pharmacies, etc.

      The drug company Lykos funded studies into MDMA/ecstasy/Molly as PTSD treatment, and submitted an application for being the exclusive licensed provider of MDMA. Now, the studies were rejected, but mainly because of sloppy science. If they had the evidence showing it actually works, they would’ve gotten the exclusive right to mass produce it in the U.S.

      That’s worth a lot of money, even if it is a relatively cheap drug. And if there’s exclusivity, they can set the price wherever they want, where the cheapness of the manufacturing is actually a plus for the manufacturer.