• otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re right.

      Updating symbols does allow for better reflecting a modern understanding of history, though.

      • expatriado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        does my comment makes it sound like i am against it? symbols can be whatever they want it to be, it is their nation

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          does my comment makes it sound like i am against it?

          Not explicitly, though it does read like a comment that could be made by someone who is against changing symbols in recognition of some aspects of history.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you trying to argue for honoring Columbus, or just being contrarian to try to sound smart?

      • masterofn001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        My interpretation:

        History happened.

        That doesn’t change.

        Changing symbols doesn’t change that.

        Columbus doesn’t deserve honour. Nor a place on the coat of arms.

        Columbus was an asshole.

        History still happened.

        Trinidad now chooses who / what they wish to celebrate and honour.

        History is not deleted.