A transgender woman from Australia has won a discrimination case against a women-only social media app, after she was denied access on the basis of being male.

The Federal Court found that although Roxanne Tickle had not been directly discriminated against, she was a victim of indirect discrimination - which refers to when a decision disadvantages a person with a particular attribute - and ordered the app to pay her A$10,000 ($6,700; £5,100) plus costs.

It’s a landmark ruling when it comes to gender identity, and at the very heart of the case was the ever more contentious question: what is a woman?

In 2021, Tickle downloaded “Giggle for Girls”, an app marketed as an online refuge where women could share their experiences in a safe space, and where men were not allowed.

  • girlfreddyOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    So you used a false equivalency then?

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      What are you talking about? You realise case law has far reaching implications right?

      • girlfreddyOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well obviously you weren’t the judge so maybe you don’t know all the facts that were presented in court.

        Besides, a dating website is much different than a website one goes to find friends of the same gender.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Are you not capable of reading your own article?

          Australia’s interpretation of the law in a case that got this level of media attention is likely to have global repercussions.