sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to UK Politics@feddit.uk · 4 months agoSewage-spilling English water firms could be denied ‘top marks’ in rankings | Water industrywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down10
arrow-up151arrow-down1external-linkSewage-spilling English water firms could be denied ‘top marks’ in rankings | Water industrywww.theguardian.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to UK Politics@feddit.uk · 4 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareDarkard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·4 months agoAh cool, so now I can check out their ratings and decide on the best one to use? Oh no wait, I have no choice at all and this is irrelevant bullshit.
minus-squareJaccident@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 months agoWell the ratings are part of the evidence base used to justify CEO pay, which is why they are threatening this. Hard to say you personally deserve more money if the company has gone from 4-Star to 1-Star.
minus-squareGreatAlbatross@feddit.ukMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoBut what if the CEO is a five-star-man?
Ah cool, so now I can check out their ratings and decide on the best one to use?
Oh no wait, I have no choice at all and this is irrelevant bullshit.
Well the ratings are part of the evidence base used to justify CEO pay, which is why they are threatening this. Hard to say you personally deserve more money if the company has gone from 4-Star to 1-Star.
But what if the CEO is a five-star-man?