• n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    Like GA, a battleground state, where they just made it legal for the elections board (3 Republicans and 2 Democrats) to refuse to certify the election results for absolutely no reason, indefinitely, without any burden of proof? Even if 100% of people in GA voted for Harris, they’d find some bullshit reason to refuse to certify the state’s results. Kemp is too much of a fickle piece of shit to stand up against it, so we’ve already lost the state in November.

    • BlameThePeacock
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s literally what the article is about, you clearly didn’t read it.

      • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I absolutely read it, I was replying to the comment that “every state needs to help make Harris a clear winner” by pointing out that the Republicans literally already made it impossible to make Harris a clear winner in GA.

        But ok, tell me more about what I did and didn’t read.

        • BlameThePeacock
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if Georgia certifies or not if Harris clearly wins enough states to get 270.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            both georgia and arizona have recently passed laws that allow their elected officials to effectively ignore the vote and most of the rest of the battleground states will have something similar too before the election; so where are those 270 votes going to come from?