• spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Right, but remember only like 60% of homes have gas anyway, so that’s not necessarily the baseline from a resiliency perspective. And a huge chunk of those aren’t actually prepared to operate without electricity either. So while I agree that resiliency is worth focusing on, we should also look holistically about what gas can/cannot do and the associated costs relative to electrification/solar/storage. A modern gas home will still need a backup generator to run condensing hot water/furnace and there’s a significant cost to whole home generators, so it’s not all fun and games just having gas appliances.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. We just installed a small generac to support us during increasingly regular power outages, with automatic failover. 7k all in.

      This is in addition to a small thermal solar array, and a small pv solar array with 5kwh (but expandable) storage that we previously had.

      So as you can imagine, resiliency is high on my mind lol

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a fascinating topic. It’s top of my mind too - we have had very reliable power historically (Colorado) but in the last year had a major preemptive wildfire shutdown and a few other shutdowns (whereas literally less than 5 minutes of outage the last decade). I also got rid of my gas service last year and fully electrified. I have solar, but was waiting until battery prices dropped before going that route. Figured I’d yolo in the meantime, but that assumption has me increasingly on edge. From a climate perspective, I do hate to see a renewed interest in gas but I get why. We need cheaper batteries and standardized V2H/V2G asap.