• masterofn001
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s clear bibi is not bargaining.

    So, what would be the point?

    Either kill them because bibi doesn’t care, blame it on bibi.

    Or release them all, and then watch bibi continue to slaughter kids, because bibi doesn’t care.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the other option is to fight until everyone is dead? Maybe they should care about Gazans and not do that?

      I mean you’re basically saying give up and die.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          How about all the Palestinians who aren’t part of this resistance and just don’t want anyone to kill them? You know, like all the children? Maybe don’t just sacrifice them for the glorious revolution?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              4 months ago

              Or how about rather than finger pointing and saying, “blame them if all the children die in the glorious revolution,” solutions should be found so that doesn’t happen?

              Why is stopping innocent people from dying not a consideration for so many people here? Just saying “blame Israel” doesn’t stop Israel from killing people. It’s not a solution.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            You know Israel routinely kills Palestinians regardless of this conflict or not. They were dying before and will die after as long as Israel is around.

            Maybe don’t sacrifice them to keep the human right abuse and genocidal status quo?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yet again- what is the solution to save lives? Because I keep hearing people suggesting that Israel will just kill everyone and, despite what someone else said, asking Israel to stop is not going to work.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Should Ukraine surrender to Russia because it would save lives by ending the war?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  When did I say anything about surrendering?

                  Since when is a negotiated ceasefire a surrender?

                  • roboto@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    That’s what most Palestinians want and what even Hamas agreed to no? I mean Hamas even agreed to disarm if there’s a two state solution. Not that it would be good for Palestinians to be ruled by Hamas and not that I trust that the armed fractions would just be like „um yeah ok I guess this is it“.

                    But anyway I have no answers to how to achieve a ceasefire since the Israelis are actively blocking any ceasefire currently and any path to Palestinian sovereignty ever since. I think that’s where OP is coming from.

      • masterofn001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not.at.all.

        I’m saying it doesn’t matter if they show any goodwill or they are saints, or if they mass murder them in public.

        Bibi doesn’t care.

        Bibi, and a lot of others are genocidal maniacs.

        The only option bibi leaves is to fight back.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          4 months ago

          They are fighting back.

          They’re also massively outgunned, so they will lose eventually. At the expense of the rest of Gazans. Why is that an acceptable outcome to you rather than a negotiated ceasefire?

          • masterofn001
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Because bibi DOESNT CARE.

            There will NEVER BE A NEGOTIATED CEASEFIRE.

            Bibi is fucking evil.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              4 months ago

              So, again, you’re saying just let all the Gazans die.

              Because without a negotiated ceasefire, whether you think it will happen or not (and I would love to borrow your crystal ball), that is what will happen.

              There will be no other outcome.

              That is not acceptable.

              • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                I believe they are saying that thanks to Bibi, there can’t be a cease-fire. They aren’t advocating for them to kill the hostages or hand them all over, they are saying regardless of what happens with the hostages Bibi is going to continue to indiscriminately kill Gazans. In a tongue in cheek manner it was suggested Bibi is using the hostages as an excuse for continued attacks, so if there aren’t hostages, there’s no excuse. I don’t think that was an honest suggestion, just gallows humor. But the point is valid that Bibi doesn’t actually care about the hostages and will keep genociding to his heart’s content.

                • masterofn001
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Thank you for your reading comprehension skills.

                  That’s exactly what I was getting at.

                  Edit: I mean, I said in my first response to that (now blocked) person was"the only option bibi leaves is to fight back"

                  I don’t know how that was unclear.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  18
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I don’t think they are being tongue-in-cheek at all. From all I can see, they’re saying that there will be no negotiations, period, so Hamas needs to fight until everyone is dead.

                  Because, again, that is the only option I can see if there isn’t even a point in trying to negotiate. They are fighting a vastly superior force in a tiny space around a lot of innocent people.