Rural tends to spend less per student. Schools are funded by local taxes for the majority of the expenditures. When most your population is below poverty level income, you just don’t want the tax base.
You also can’t get private schools to compete for the 10 kids in the class.
So that’s one scenario I don’t know what the right answer is.
We’ve already done in to inner city kids since the 1970’s.
I am a big advocate the education is the way to solve income disparity. The solution isn’t wealth distraction. It’s making sure every child has a quality education.
Also when you first start there will be a limit to capacity. The private schools around today would be the ones children could attend. It’s take awhile to get a school up and certified. Overnight there would be little change and over years it’d make a positive outcome.
Rural tends to spend less per student. Schools are funded by local taxes for the majority of the expenditures. When most your population is below poverty level income, you just don’t want the tax base. You also can’t get private schools to compete for the 10 kids in the class. So that’s one scenario I don’t know what the right answer is.
But even though you don’t know the answer you’re okay with defunding the current solution because you don’t agree with it?
Since they’d still have public school, their situation would stay the same but it would improve the education of millions of poor minority children.
I think that’s a good thing.
But every parent that you supply with vouchers takes money out of the public system until it collapses.
Or it improves. It’s their choice. Right now public schools have a monopoly and vouchers break that monopoly. They can either improve or fail.
Either way the children benefit with a better education and that is what is important.
You don’t play the sink or swim game when an entire generation of kid’s education is on the line.
It’s so funny how the user people always see as a troll just wipes the floor with these reactionaries.
You love to see it.
We’ve already done in to inner city kids since the 1970’s.
I am a big advocate the education is the way to solve income disparity. The solution isn’t wealth distraction. It’s making sure every child has a quality education.
Also when you first start there will be a limit to capacity. The private schools around today would be the ones children could attend. It’s take awhile to get a school up and certified. Overnight there would be little change and over years it’d make a positive outcome.