• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not according to the etymology. https://www.etymonline.com/word/*removed*

    1786, earlier neger (1568, Scottish and northern England dialect), negar, negur, from French nègre, from Spanish negro (see Negro).

    All of these languages are latin-based languages… So there must be a latin root. If you dig further you find

    from Latin nigrum (nominative niger) “black, dark, sable, dusky” (applied to the night sky, a storm, the complexion), figuratively “gloomy, unlucky, bad, wicked,”

    So yes negro exists in the middle but not as the source necessarily… It would have evolved (if I read the etymology correctly) as Nigrum -> Niger -> Negro/neger/negar/negur -> removed.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Good thing the N word is being censored here, otherwise we might actually learn something.

      I fucking hate indiscriminate censorship. In some context the word is important in order to learn and educate

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah… While admittedly discussions like this one are far outweighed by the negative uses of the term; when discussion is happening where clarity is more relevant than appeasing the euphemism treadmill censorship sucks.

        https://lemmy.saik0.com/comment/3423797 should get you to the original version. My instance doesn’t censor.