• Pratai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Wholeheartedly.

        • Pratai
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you have problems following the topic of discussion? Because no one said anything about vacuums. For one, vacuums aren’t based on AI. Secondly, the topic is about AI taking jobs from people.

          Try and keep up.

          • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Modern robot vacuums do use AI. Try and keep up indeed.

            The point of the vacuum example is to understand which parts of a ‘job’ you have a problem with AI replacing, using a housework example which requires labor but provides no income. I take it from your non-answer that you have no problem with AI replacing labor, just not income. Is that correct?

            • Pratai
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              ROFL. A roomba is not AI. It’s just programmed to not bump into walls. Roomba’s don’t learn, nor are they taking anyone’s job

              Go back and read the meme. And this time- attempt to understand it. It’s about JOBS. not labor.