Google packed the Pixel 9 Pro XL with a punch, as evidenced by its latest leaked specs.

  • Vik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    similar boat. the pixel security model is tough to move away from. I dislike practically everything else about my p7.

      • Vik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        how much time do you have 😓

        The pixel security model makes secure, privacy respecting custom ROMs like GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, DivestOS more accessible.

        My issues with the P7 are more like generic hangups seen with most phones today, and are not necessarily specifc to the phone itself. This is bearing in mind that my prior phone from 2019 (SD855 SoC) featured an LCD FHD display (without rounded corners or cutouts), headphone jack, notification LED, SD card slot. I had a lot of the hardware amenities that were already being phased out around that time.

        I’ve made peace with the idea that I won’t get these back (I’m not going back to vendor ROMs), it’s just a shame that vendors can cut away at everything nice to have in the pursuit of cost optimisation.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, the phone duopoly is awful, especially for the software. Even on Graphene OS there’s bullshit like notifications only turning on some tiny portion of the screen with a brightness level near zero. Like, I have the setting on so I can see when notifications come in.

          But yes I do miss the SD card slot. Not so much headphone jack because I personally prefer wireless but I stand with you.

          And I have all day keep going.

          Edit: sorry most of that wasn’t relevant to your comment.

          • Vik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No worries, I’m just ranting at this point.

            The headphone jack is a sore spot for me, I have a few speaker systems around the house and garage with 3.5mm. I use an adapter but wired audio over USB C on android has terrible UX; it’s treated as a generic USB device, so it carries the same security implications (can only route audio with the device unlocked, can cut out if you lock the phone shortly after). Audio quality over type C + adapter has been worse in my experience but this will vary by device.

            The displays are kind of a multi faceted thing for me. I can always see the impact of the pentile sub-pixel layout on text regardless of pixel density. I cannot unsee that sort of screen door effect.

            Compared to LCD IPS, you might notice a smearing effect with UI animations on oled, I believe the same can be observed with desktop displays (in addition to VRR backlight flicker on darker content)

            There’s also the faster rate of degradation it carries as a technology, which has prompted mitigations at the OS level.

            The infinite contrast / per pixel backlighting is nice for sure, though it’s led to AOD replacing dedicated notification RGB LEDs (which feels sort of inelegant; that’s additional content to render on display and it’s generally less functional than addressable RGB at a glance), has enabled under-display fingerprint readers (which pale in performance to conventional sensors). Rounded corners aren’t intrinsic to oled but camera hole punch designs seem to be. Those camera holes will never not look like a design concession to me. 18 months with this and I still think it’s dumb.

            The phone feels pretty solid but the back is glass, the sides are slippery without a case, and the glass on both sides protrudes past the bezel, making it a bit more damage prone.

            None of these things are intrinsic to the pixel, it’s sad to see so little variation out there though.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Hmm, seems like some phones don’t have a DAC anymore and thus, the USB-C adapter need to get the audio in digital form and use its own DAC…

              I guess in that case, it would be a better experience attaching a wifi audio receiver and send the hifi signal over that. Best scenario would be if the music box would have a digital in port you can use, so you would use the DAC dedicated to your speakers, which is better than phone DAC in most cases.

              • Vik@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve been looking at several powered adapters as well as Bluetooth receivers with aux output. I’ve also considered a low power dedicated music system, problem for the garage is no wlan access.

                • Petter1@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Oh, I see, 😄 maybe you can “steal” a car radio from a wrecked car 😁 many of those have great DAC and bluetooth and/or a USB-A port for music input.

                  If touch and android car compatible, you’d get a very nice experience, I assume.

                  Ah, and of course, what comes out of car radios is an analog audio signal that powers the speakers directly. I think you could use that analog out signal and feed it into the aux port 😇