- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Nyobolt, based in Cambridge, has developed a new 35kWh lithium-ion battery that was charged from 10% to 80% in just over four and a half minutes in its first live demonstration last week. […] Nyobolt’s technology builds on a decade of research led by University of Cambridge battery scientist Clare Grey and Cambridge-educated Shivareddy, the company said. Key to its batteries’ ability to be charged super-fast without a big impact on their longevity is a design that means they generate less heat. It also makes them safer as overheating can cause a lithium-ion battery to catch fire and explode. In addition, the materials used to make the batteries’ anodes allow for a faster transfer of electrons. Nyobolt is currently in talks to sell its batteries to eight electric car manufacturers. At 35 kWh, the battery is much smaller than the 85 kWh in a more typical American electric vehicle (EV). Yet the technology may be used in larger battery packs in the future.
Independent testing of Nyobolt’s batteries by what it called a leading global manufacturer found that they can achieve over 4,000 fast-charge cycles, equivalent to 600,000 miles (965,600 kilometers), while retaining more than 80% of capacity, Nyobolt said in its Friday statement. William Kephart, an e-mobility specialist at consultancy P3 Group and a former engineer, said EV batteries of the kind Nyobolt has developed could “theoretically” be charged as fast as the firm is promising, but the challenge was manufacturing such batteries on an industrial scale. A crucial chemical element in Nyobolt’s batteries is niobium but, as Kephart pointed out, last year only an estimated 83,000 tons (94,500 tons) was mined worldwide. Compare that with graphite, commonly used as anode material in lithium-ion batteries: an estimated 1.6 million tons (1.8 million tons) was produced in 2023. In addition, there are currently “a lot of unknowns” with the niobium battery technology, he told CNN. “The industry will work it out (but) it’s not seen by the industry as a scalable technology just yet,” he added.
You must log in or register to comment.
On paper, they look comparable to Tesla batteries. These new batteries are about half the size of Tesla’s, and the test was performed with a charging station that delivered more than twice the power of a typical Supercharger station. Try charging two of them at the speed our current charging infrastructure will support and it’ll take about 20 minutes.
What seems to be new and improved is that these batteries can apparently accept more energy from a charging station without overheating, and the rate at which they permanently lose maximum capacity from Level 3 charging is reduced.
I wonder how heavy they are compared to the competition?
It doesn’t seem like a Tesla battery at all to me. It uses a rare material that can’t be scaled to industrial levels with the current mining yields, and it charges far faster. It’s a completely new type of battery that will probably undergo many changes before it ever hits the market, but it’s a remarkable discovery.
I wonder how heavy they are compared to the competition?
You mean the kw charging cable?
So…
70% of 35kWh ➡️ 35kWh*0.7 = 24.5kWh 24.5*(60/4.5) ~ 326kW of charging powerNot bad. I mean realistically, on average, you’d get maybe close to 150kW charging. That’s still not bad.
To charge at that rate, you’d probably want more than 326kW at the beginning, and less at the end. An empty battery changes faster than a nearly full one.
I like using the bathtub as a comparison for batteries. Fill it as fast as you want at first but you can’t let it overflow. As you get closer to the top you have to slow down more and more. At closer to 80 percent you should be charging at closer to 20 percent or less of the rate you did at the start. As you crest 80 percent the chasing rare should almost plummet.
Edit: As you crest 80 percent the charging rate should almost plummet.
I hate it when my chasing rare plummets
Thank you I fixed it.
Cool! But specific energy (g/wh) and cost are always important metrics for adoption. Do they have any info on those?
Can we stop posting cnn articles
Wow, still way slower than a gas tank, but hey, a step in the right direction.
My gas tank isn’t full every time I leave the house.
Honestly this nails it. Even with my slow to charge PHEV (level 1 charging only for now) I leave full daily.
I just had this discussion in another thread. Slow charging isn’t great but most people don’t drive 50+ miles every single day. I found on Tesla’s site they say a standard household outlet gets you 2-3 miles per hour of range. That’s 30 miles or so in the time most people are home overnight.
A 240v connection apparently charges 10x quicker for people that wanted more assurance, but either way, most of time you’d be leaving topped up or close to it. This seems more of an issue for people living in apartment buildings without access to home charging at all.
I work for a trade company and have access to at cost electrical work, have enough capacity in my panel, and yet we still haven’t felt the need to add wiring for a level 2 charger since it fills from empty in about 8 hours. Pretty much saving the upgrade for when we buy a full EV.
Cheaper than gas? Who cares?
Better for the environment? Not my problem.
Never have to drive out of my way to go to a smelly gas station and get bothered by people begging for money for gas to go to a “job interview?” I like smelling like poison.
Saving 10 minutes once a week? Now you’re speaking to what’s important to me!!
Hit the nail right on the head. Thank you.
Edit
Also. The only time i charge at fast speed, is for road trips. Maybe twice a year. I can spend a couple of minutes charging, without a problem.
It still takes a few minutes to refuel a 15 gallon tank in a sedan. You don’t have an extra minute or two?
