I think she does - the bill is about materials being sent home with kids from schools that include sodomy or grooming or the incredibly vague ‘lgbt agenda’
It’s designed so that instead of banning books individually, they can just sue for anything they don’t like.
The headline makes it sound ridiculous - and in a way it is, of course - but it’s potentially dangerous. I don’t know how much sway her organisation has, if it’s big or niche. Hopefully zero
I wonder if she knows that it’s already illegal?
Or is she just salty that priests are the ones being arrested?
I think she does - the bill is about materials being sent home with kids from schools that include sodomy or grooming or the incredibly vague ‘lgbt agenda’
It’s designed so that instead of banning books individually, they can just sue for anything they don’t like.
The headline makes it sound ridiculous - and in a way it is, of course - but it’s potentially dangerous. I don’t know how much sway her organisation has, if it’s big or niche. Hopefully zero
Except that by “groom kids with sodomy,” she means “teach them that queer people exist and that they’re normal people.”
Yeah, there’s that.
They like changing definitions. Though, if we’re gonna talk about groomers, she’s more likely to be one than drag or LGBTQ, and it ain’t even close.
Definitely. You don’t hear stories about drag queens committing sexual assault against children.
You hear a lot of stories of religious figures doing it though…
No she’s just an idiot with an agenda. Her propaganda software is just stuck in a recursion loop.