• Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It does seem absurd that this stuff is tried in front of supreme court justices.

    Could we do something like you say that involves experts in the field weighing in on the pros and cons, and costs?

    Is it that the supreme court justices shouldn’t hear these cases at all, or that they are just so corrupt they can’t rule fairly?