• 31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Some of it has to do with CAFE standards using vehicle footprint to determine the target MPG. Some of it is because of better safety standards. Some of it is just because that’s what a certain portion of the market wants, and the profit margins on the large vehicles are higher, so they spend more money marketing them (creating more demand).

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Some of it has to do with CAFE standards using vehicle footprint to determine the target MPG.

      gotta love when the funny regulations do the opposite of what you expect them to do.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, a lot of the regulations are written by the industries they’re supposed to regulate.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          if you actually look into what the insurance industries do for crash safety testing it’s actually kind of fucked up.

          Because they basically started with full frontal impacts at n speed, that was met, so a decade later they were like “half frontal impacts are a thing now” and turns out most cars performed pretty bad on that, so they fixed that, and like a decade later again, they were fine, and then they were like “oh no, now quarter impact frontal is bad now” and then that’s what they’ve recently fixed.

          So most of car safety seems to be for pretty specific, though i suppose “more likely” impacts.