The commission has five members, each elected to represent one of five districts in Georgia. But elections for each seat are decided in a statewide vote; though the commissioners must live in the district they represent, a voter in Savannah or Augusta has as much say over the commissioner representing Atlanta as a voter who lives there.

By saying it would not consider the plaintiffs’ appeal, the supreme court let stand an appellate court decision that said Georgia’s statewide elections for local districts on the rate-setting body is constitutional.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    From the article:

    The commission has five members, each elected to represent one of five districts in Georgia. But elections for each seat are decided in a statewide vote; though the commissioners must live in the district they represent, a voter in Savannah or Augusta has as much say over the commissioner representing Atlanta as a voter who lives there.

    Yeah, that’s a lot of bullshit.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is not different from five state-wide positions with a requirement that the candidates live in a specific region. It’s weird but not particularly unfair.

      It’s just a matter of presentation.