• jerkface
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As if that were the only thing it could be used for.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point is, 94.8% of nuclear waste is unburnt uranium, 1% is plutonium, and the rest isn’t that dangerous long term.

      There’s no need to bury waste for hundreds of thousands of years, if you just remove and burn the stuff that is dangerous long term.

      And if burning plutonium for fuel is such a deal breaker, we can switch from the uranium fuel cycle over to the thorium fuel cycle. But that one too faces opposition, because most of the opposition is coming from the fossil fuel industry. They hate nuclear with a passion, because it decouples electricity from oil and natural gas. Which wind and solar currently do not.