I saw this post on [email protected]: https://lemmy.world/post/2387220

I got me in a philosophical mood.

Is it okay to burn a Koran?

On one hand, a Koran, a Bible or anything else “sacred” literature is paper and ink. And burning them is just disposing of said book. Children are taught at young age not to get provocated by provocators. Adults should be able to live with this principle.

On the other hand, burning is not the main reason people get upset when sacred literature is burnt. The whole burning ordeal is (usually) a symbol for hate. Hate should not be tolerated, and therefore it is wrong to burn a sacred books. It is imporant to make hateful actions illegal to prevent hate from spreading. If hate is allowed, then we are possibly facing hate crimes and violent actions towards minorities.

Burning a sacred book is not always about hate. It can also be a symbolical protest. In sweden, a few weeks ago, Iraqi man burned a Koran. According to news I read at the time of said event, the man justified his actions as a protest against Iraqi government. He was kept prisoner in his homecountry and tortured during his imprisonment.

Iraq is a theocracy. Amputations and even death sentence are used as forms of punishment. People are not equal and theistic law is above other laws. The country does not follow UN’s declaration of human rights. These human rights are recognized all over the globe and should be held as standards for all.

If someone burns a sacred book to protest torture, amputations or death sentences, I think it is not morally wrong, but quite the contrary. Burning a book is a victimless crime. Forementioned actions of Iraqi government however are not.

Thoughts from an European atheist.

Im interested to hear your thoughts on this matter and hoping to understand this question from different perspectives.

  • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s unkind, and disrespectful. It would be awesome if we had a society which mandated a basic level of respect. But, would that be a society of free speech?

    People should be free to burn religious texts, though perhaps deliberate provocation to cause violence should fall under already-existing laws against causing a disturbance or riot.

    My final thought… any community which feels they have to resort to threats, violence and murder because they felt offended, imo only reveals how stunted, insecure and stupid they are.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It would be awesome if we had a society which mandated a basic level of respect.

      Not sure what that would mean in this case. Because abrahamic scripture contains passages which would be prohibited under this rule.

    • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would be upset if someone burned a Bible but it would ultimately be on them for whatever consequences God has in mind. I wouldn’t dream of retaliating over something so dumb