• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Whether he actually had sex with her or not is irrelevant. He issued a hush-money payment to her not to talk about the encounter, and then committed business fraud to cover up that payment, and because it was during an election, that also constituted election fraud.

    • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the whole thing that’s ridiculous to me. It’s not the fact that he had sex with her, it’s not even the fact that he paid her to shut the fuck up, it’s the fact that he covered it up and committed fraud. He could have just boasted about it publicly and it’s unlikely anyone would have cared.

    • girlfreddy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yup. Same thing with Clinton - having an affair wasn’t the issue … lying about it was.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The sex proven in court might be a clause in Melania’s prenup. She and Baron might have a get out of jail free card; it makes sense why trump keeps demanding there was no affair.