• Khanzarate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    It is though. It’s the mixing thing.

    You can order a steak rare at a restaurant, no worries. They won’t serve you a hamburger that hasn’t reached temperature. There’s only one real difference; your steak has a miniscule chance the cow it came from was sick, while that hamburger has the bacteria of every cow that went into the meat grinder.

    As per the other comments, we have thousands of cows per bottle of milk. 1000x the risk that someone drinking raw milk from their family farm has.

    • CarrierLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      (Pedantic, but informative incoming)

      That’s not the reason.

      Cow muscle tissue is dense and difficult for bacteria to penetrate, with a single surface area (the outside) assuming safe handling and “edible freshness”. So cooking the outside to “rare” offers protection by cooking off surface or lightly penetrated bacteria.

      Ground beef is soft and porous, with a massive surface area, much easier for bacteria to penetrate completely.

      However, that aside, your analogy has a sound basis: more input sources = higher opportunity for corruption.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well hey I appreciate it, I genuinely thought what i wrote was the whole thing, I’m glad to know that there’s more, and the details behind it.

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Steak only has bacteria on the surface and only needs the surface to be seared, while hamburger, even from a single cow, has been mixed so that any bacteria is present throughout.