• RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because people who are born lucky enough to have an easy life are likely to have more kids.

    Using cortisol to magnify that improves selection bias.

    The rest is math.

    Evolution is a bitch.

        • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          what does “recent” mean? Poor folks been having shit tons of kids for a long ass time. THey needed to have a) extra workers, and b) a chance at keeping the family name/heritage/culture/whatever going. especialyl being poor, you know at least 3 or your 10 arent going to make it, so you gotta play the odds!

          • Donkter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            IDK if the original hypothesis is true or not. But it’s kind of impossible to make judgements on evolution based on anything we know about humans and society. Modern homo sapiens are only about 150,000 years old and were pretty sure any semblance of a modern hierarchical society didn’t begin until about 7,500 years ago, much less the concept of money which only happened another thousands of years later.

            10,000 years is a drop in the bucket evolutionarily, hell, 100,000 years doesn’t even do much, so any theory of evolution or why a complex hormone like cortisol evolved to be used in the way it is now is way off base if you’re referencing concepts like “rich” and “poor” or reference to any form of societal structure made in the last 10,000 years.

      • Talia@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Immagine what it could be if the cortisol mechanism didn’t work