A New Jersey electrician who repeatedly attacked police officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, siege at the U.S. Capitol was sentenced on Friday to 12 years in prison by a judge who called him “a menace to our society.”

Christopher Joseph Quaglin argued with and insulted U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden before and after the judge handed him one of the longest prison sentences among hundreds of Capitol riot cases.

“You’re Trump’s worst mistake of 2016,” Quaglin told McFadden, who was nominated to the court by then-President Donald Trump in 2017.

“What an outrage. What a disgrace,” the judge said.

Quaglin complained about his jail conditions and pushed conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6 siege during his rambling remarks in the courtroom. He also took issue with labeling the Jan. 6 attack as an insurrection.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Quaglin complained about his jail conditions

    I absolutely love how republicans all think prisons are insufficiently cruel, then suddenly become prison abolitionists, but only for Trump and Jan 6ers.

    Like nah they’re treating you with kiddy gloves. People got decades for non-violent crimes during the George Floyd protests.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trump, the guy who said that police should rough up people they arrest, can’t take the temperature of the courtroom (which isn’t even cold). He complains about it constantly.

      But prisons are supposed to be cruel?

      • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, prisons are not supposed to be cruel. They are supposed to be safe places of learning that rehabilitate those society has failed. We have a bunch of sadistic toddlers running the place sadly, so here we are.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m certain I saw something about someone getting 10+ years for burning police cars back in 2020, but I can’t find it.

        I could be misremembering and it was just the prosecutor asking for it, or google could just be complete shit now.

          • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            According to every law enforcement agency in the U.S., federal and local, property crime is categorically different than violent crime.

            Unless someone was injured or attacked, burning an empty vehicle is only a property crime.

            • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Where is all this caviler attitude to setting fire to something with possibly 20 gallons of accelerant in it’s belly on a public street coming from. Can not speak to other states but NY literally has justification of murder if you see someone setting your residence on fire, you are fully authorized to kill them under law, NYPL 35.20(2) and thats New York (Including NYC). The risk to grave physical injury is so high in a fire that it is okay to kill to stop it. Trying to say literally trying to torch something with a belly of gas on a public street is okay? Do they not still teach about the Great Chicago fire and San Francisco Earthquake Fire in school anymore?

              • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                A house is not an obviously empty car. These two scenarios are not the same at all.

                If a person is in danger, or could reasonably be expected to be in danger, then the elements of the crime obviously change significantly.