• ours@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    The asymmetry between the cost of defense vs. offense here is absurd.

    The operation of air defense networks, missiles, and fighter jet interceptions, all to try to down kit aircraft costing less than the average Porsche sports car. Fancy-pantsy capabilities that required billions not long ago can be had for cheap. It’s no longer the exclusive realm of low-flying supersonic or stealth aircraft to strike the heart of the enemy. What required billions of R&D can be somewhat achieved on the cheap.

    • RidderSport@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well no. The cost of defence is not actually what pricetag the system is you use to shoot something done. It is what you are defending and an oil refinery is probably in the hundreds of millions, literally a high-profile target

      • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, spending a hundred thousand to take out a refinery cracker is an amazing trade. What’s a cracker worth, a few tens of millions? Plus lost production etc