Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed a bill into law on Monday that strengthens the rights of homeowners against squatters who illegally occupy their property.
Just 9 days ago you posted about how corporations are creating a housing crisis and now you’re posting about how people affected by the housing crisis should be sent to jail. I don’t understand your stance.
Conservatives are not a monolith. Theres libertarians, the religious guys, corporate dudes, gun owners, cyber privacy/open source guys, TERFs, even people who dont really care much for politics but lean right anyways. Being cheeky, conservatives are diverse in thought.
So long as the post is conservative in some way, its generally good to go. (And not instance rule breaking too, but that goes without saying)
SFH are homes for people to live in, raise their families, etc. They are not investments. The large majority of homes should be priced where the average person can buy one.
So I’m still confused. From this comment I’d assume you’d be against people being sent to jail for living in a home they are raising their family in because someone else wants to use it as an investment.
I’m trying to have a discussion. What do you think about this law change? I personally believe it makes no sense. Why would the government pay to put people in jail instead of ensure they have access to affordable housing?
Dude’s using their mod status and enforcement of the rules in this community to assert what they perceive to be their correctness. It’s power tripping behavior. I’ve been calling it out here for several weeks now.
It’s silly a mod expects us to argue in good faith when they won’t even do that themselves. Notice how they seem to never admit being wrong about any of it.
Just 9 days ago you posted about how corporations are creating a housing crisis and now you’re posting about how people affected by the housing crisis should be sent to jail. I don’t understand your stance.
Strictly speaking, you dont need to agree with the articles, just want to talk about them.
Wouldn’t it violate the rules of this community if a conservative doesn’t agree with the article being posted?
Conservatives are not a monolith. Theres libertarians, the religious guys, corporate dudes, gun owners, cyber privacy/open source guys, TERFs, even people who dont really care much for politics but lean right anyways. Being cheeky, conservatives are diverse in thought.
So long as the post is conservative in some way, its generally good to go. (And not instance rule breaking too, but that goes without saying)
I am not the author of the articles. I hope that clears up the confusion
You’re trying to paint a narrative with the articles you post.
You are the author of this comment
So I’m still confused. From this comment I’d assume you’d be against people being sent to jail for living in a home they are raising their family in because someone else wants to use it as an investment.
I never made a statement. I posted content for discussion.
So you don’t agree with this law change?
I am stating my opinion one way or the other. I post articles for discussion.
I’m trying to have a discussion. What do you think about this law change? I personally believe it makes no sense. Why would the government pay to put people in jail instead of ensure they have access to affordable housing?
Dude’s using their mod status and enforcement of the rules in this community to assert what they perceive to be their correctness. It’s power tripping behavior. I’ve been calling it out here for several weeks now.
It’s silly a mod expects us to argue in good faith when they won’t even do that themselves. Notice how they seem to never admit being wrong about any of it.