For a long time, I thought of the blockchain as almost synonymous with cryptocurrencies, so as I saw stuff like “Odyssey” and “lbry” appearing and being “based on the blockchain”, my first thought was that it was another crypto scam. Then, I just got reminded of it and started looking more into it, and it just seemed like regular torrenting. For example, what’s the big innovation separating Odyssey from Peertube, which is also decentralized and also uses P2P? And what part of it does the blockchain really play, that couldn’t be done with regular P2P? More generally, and looking at the futur, does the blockchain offer new possibilities that the fediverse or pre-existing protocols don’t have?

  • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something about this comment didn’t seem right to me, so I did some quick math:

    There are approx 144,000,000 homes (incl apartments, etc) in the US. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/VET605221

    Assuming every home is sold 5 times on average, that’s 720,000,000 sale records/deeds.

    Existing blockchain implementations use IDs that are around 32 bits, or 4 bytes.

    A “home sales record” or deed on the blockchain needs to include the buyer and the time/date of sale (8 bytes), along with a cryptographic signature (4-16 bytes). The seller’s identity doesn’t need to be included because it’s always doing to be the previous owner.

    So each record is 16-28 bytes, and there are 720,000,000 records. If we go with 28bytes, it would take about 20GB to store all of the deeds for the US. A 500GB hard drive costs $20.

    • Valmond4@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      You forget that the blockchain is all about not trusting some middle-man/site, so you need to stock that blockchain yourself, everyone needs to stock that blockchain.

      So multiply not only the cost, but also the ecological impact just buying all those drives.

      And that’s only for *US" housing (I didn’t get the timeframe you used to calculate it, is it for like year 2050? Old data stays forever.).

      BTW found the guy buying 0.5TB Hard drives ;-)

      • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, everyone would need a copy of the 10s-of-GB blockchain. That’s a fraction of the amount of space a single computer game would use, does that seem unreasonable/impractical to you?

        And I buy used enterprise 2-3TB drives on eBay :) . I was going to use a 32GB flash drive for my example, but a 500GB HDD is the same price

        • Valmond4@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough about the size.

          Checked out eBay, there are some cheap 2-3Tb drives there! How does it pan out quality wise? I guess they sell them off like after 5 years of usage right?

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’s my understanding. Tbh I don’t have a lot of experience with them yet, but I’m building an 8 disk RAID6 array and I decided to go with those used drives. 10 matching disks will be around $120, and I’ll have 2 extra drives so I can rebuild the array asap if a drive fails.

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      …and 20G that needs to be replicated to tons of nodes if it should be really decentralized.

      16-28 bytes seems extremely understated, I think it could easily be off by orders of magnitude.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re just talking about ownership of a title right?

          A deed contains a lot more information than the owner. Mine is 4 pages long. Contains a map of the street, various easements, et cetera.

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, but that kind of data would be better in an auxiliary database. There’s no reason to include it in the blockchain.

            • netvor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              well but doesn’t that beat the purpose of using the blockchain in the first place? why not just store everything in the auxiliary database?

              • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Depends on why you want to use the blockchain, I guess. If you want a system to allows anyone to verify ownership of property without 3rd parties (government, etc) being involved then the auxiliary database should work fine.

                What purpose were you thinking of, that would be defeated by an aux DB?

                • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The title defines the property and the rights attached to it though.

                  Like the block chain might be able to confirm who owns the property ID, but not what is defined by that property ID. The only way to confirm what is represented by a given property ID is… by referring to a trusted authority which can provide the title.

                  Property ownership is much more complicated than just an address and a name. A title defines the boundaries of the property, and confers many and varied legal rights.