Pfizer rushed their trials and used their lobbying power to attempt to increase profits from the pandemic. Later data from the real world showed that their efficacy scores were lower than in the initial trials and not that much higher than rival cheaper vaccines.
Pfizer also did all these ethically dubious things without having enough manufacturing capacity to fulfill potential orders from the whole world, making it somewhat needlessly damaging
you mean the manufacturing capacity part? Nations who did not place their orders very early would have had to wait a long time and many went with alternatives which did not have such a long wait
I mean I know that and I get that the whistleblower is calling them out for bad scientific practices in the name of profits, I’m just confused as to how the two points are connected.
Them having the “best” vaccine allowed them to secure a lot of orders, while still scrambling to actually fulfill the orders because of the complex and novel production process. This led to delays which is not a good thing when it comes to a critical vaccine…