• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is shocking because they did it after the investigation had started, which is monumentally stupid.

      You can destroy any records you want at any time, unless there’s an investigation underway or you have good reason to believe one will be starting. At that point, you’re destroying evidence.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The crazy part is the implication that the evidence destroyed was probably more damning than having a judge and jury assume anything reasonably suggested to have been implicated by those chats as true.

        • eronth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I wager they’re so used to getting away with shit that destroying evidence probably says less about the crimes committed and more about the piss-poor justice system.

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            *sigh* After reading some of the other comments, I have to agree. I’m not sure whether to be relieved or even more discouraged. It’s a dreadfully boring dystopia.

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it’s shocking that the destroyed evidence after being explicitly instructed not to.