Chemical bonds can affect decay rates IIRC, but it’s not usually a huge difference. The nucleus is still going to be unstable. It definitely changes the molecule (and might break it)
That’s interesting. Only read about this in High School and maybe because of the “not usually a huge difference”, it was claimed that chemical bonds don’t affect decay rates.
I always felt a bit weird with that conclusion, but maybe it was just to make the maths easier, not having to include effects from another force into the calculations.
It’s like saying ants don’t affect buildings. In the vast majority of situations it’s true, but carpenter ants can destroy wooden structures in some cimates.
The high school class is concerned about the effects of gravity, wind, rain, earthquakes, and maybe taxes on buildings, while the college+ classes can get into the effects of wood eating organisms, angry tenants, and killdozers.
Chemical bonds can affect decay rates IIRC, but it’s not usually a huge difference. The nucleus is still going to be unstable. It definitely changes the molecule (and might break it)
That’s interesting. Only read about this in High School and maybe because of the “not usually a huge difference”, it was claimed that chemical bonds don’t affect decay rates.
I always felt a bit weird with that conclusion, but maybe it was just to make the maths easier, not having to include effects from another force into the calculations.
It’s like saying ants don’t affect buildings. In the vast majority of situations it’s true, but carpenter ants can destroy wooden structures in some cimates.
The high school class is concerned about the effects of gravity, wind, rain, earthquakes, and maybe taxes on buildings, while the college+ classes can get into the effects of wood eating organisms, angry tenants, and killdozers.