"…there came a point, a few weeks ago, when I realized, the government isn’t going to end the war, isn’t bringing the hostages back, and isn’t helping the evacuees.”

" Increasingly, Netanyahu’s many opponents are questioning his handling of the war. Others are questioning the prime minister’s motives, suggesting his political interest lies in the continuation of the fighting, which inevitably delays his political demise. Netanyahu is currently under trial on various charges of corruption."

  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Interesting that rather than simply admit “yeah you know what? My source is an opinion article and not necessarily fact” you have to frame it as me crying about it so you can avoid admitting to yourself that maybe you made a bad call.

    Say whatever you want to say to make yourself feel superior, I’m simply happy knowing I’m right about this and you have no substantial response, like the other countless threads you’ve dipped out of throughout the week.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s not my job to do the arguing for you, which is basically the same thing you said to me last week when the inverse happened in another thread. You gave a bad reference, it’s that simple.

        I guess that means you’re welcome to cry about it.

        In the meantime I welcome anything that’s not just some conservative think tank dude’s published thoughts.

          • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Hahaha you can’t provide a good source to save your life and rather than actually try you’re just making it other people’s problem 🤣

            Even Amnesty International has been found by the US Government of being one-sided and biased.

            Washington post article is another opinion article, AND it’s paywalled.

            Stratcomcoe just 404’s.

            Now I’m starting to think you’re straight up incapable of finding a credible source for your arguments. Maybe that just means your arguments aren’t credible? You should read Rule 2.