• yuri@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a really awesome thing they did and I respect it a lot.

    I don’t think that changes the quality of the movie though, right? Unless you mean like, “They wouldn’t have done that if the movie hadn’t been made, so it’s a good movie by merit of having enabled the cheering up of one specific group of dying children”? Because I suppose you could make that argument, but I don’t know if many folks would agree with “the butterfly effect” as a metric for movie quality.

    • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a case of being tone-deaf, along with clearly sexist characters, how much of a bimbo did they make the male lead? Yeah, not as progressive as you want to pretend.

      • yuri@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m agreeing with you that the problem wasn’t women. Also Hemsworth’s character was incessantly annoying, I’ve literally never heard someone praise that performance.

        • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Agreed, I liked the girls roles they had a spark between them and good characters, but it doesn’t stop the fact people would call the film problematic if it was a woman on Chris’s role. It did have glaring sexist issues.