Neuromancer@lemm.eeM to Conservative@lemm.ee · 7 months agoTrump suggests White House as venue for debate with Biden: 'Would be very comfortable'www.foxnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down152
arrow-up1-42arrow-down1external-linkTrump suggests White House as venue for debate with Biden: 'Would be very comfortable'www.foxnews.comNeuromancer@lemm.eeM to Conservative@lemm.ee · 7 months agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareCuttlefish1111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·7 months agohttps://theconversation.com/friday-essay-project-2025-the-policy-substance-behind-trumps-showmanship-reveals-a-radical-plan-to-reshape-the-world-227161 https://www.yahoo.com/news/project-2025-movement-could-erode-130000679.html https://www.mediamatters.org/project-2025/project-2025-advisor-john-mcentee-says-initiative-charge-staffing-next-administration https://inthesetimes.com/article/project-2025-protego-trump-huber-abortion
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down16·7 months agoCite from which article says it’ll destroy the republic I see it as restoring the republic. Getting rid of the fascist and communist.
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down13·7 months agoR1. Maybe it’s because you can’t articulate your point. Try actually making a point without violating rules.
minus-squareGreen13@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-27 months agoWow, yet ANOTHER argument you lost resulting in a ban… You are FASCINATING!
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·7 months agoR1 violations is not me losing an Argument. If their only argument is calling names then they lost a long time ago.
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·7 months agoIt’s just coincidence that people who argue with you get banned? Good thing you’re not a Moderator or it would very seriously look like banning is your only tool for ending discussions. … Ohhhhh I get it
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·7 months agoTwo day troll account? Well played. R1
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-27 months agoNo. I’ve been here for over a year. Is R1 code for me being right? Or is it just your natural response when getting called out? Is it… Is it BOTH?
https://theconversation.com/friday-essay-project-2025-the-policy-substance-behind-trumps-showmanship-reveals-a-radical-plan-to-reshape-the-world-227161
https://www.yahoo.com/news/project-2025-movement-could-erode-130000679.html
https://www.mediamatters.org/project-2025/project-2025-advisor-john-mcentee-says-initiative-charge-staffing-next-administration
https://inthesetimes.com/article/project-2025-protego-trump-huber-abortion
Cite from which article says it’ll destroy the republic
I see it as restoring the republic. Getting rid of the fascist and communist.
Removed by mod
R1 r3
Removed by mod
R1.
Maybe it’s because you can’t articulate your point. Try actually making a point without violating rules.
Wow, yet ANOTHER argument you lost resulting in a ban…
You are FASCINATING!
R1 violations is not me losing an Argument. If their only argument is calling names then they lost a long time ago.
It’s just coincidence that people who argue with you get banned? Good thing you’re not a Moderator or it would very seriously look like banning is your only tool for ending discussions.
… Ohhhhh I get it
Two day troll account? Well played.
R1
No. I’ve been here for over a year.
Is R1 code for me being right? Or is it just your natural response when getting called out?
Is it… Is it BOTH?