• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    what they did to LXD

    I still don’t understand what LXD does that LXC doesn’t do. LXC is significantly more popular. All the major control panels (like Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtualizor, etc) support OpenVZ or LXC but not LXD.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not trying to argue? I legitimately don’t know what advantages LXD has since I don’t see it used widely in the industry, whereas LXC is everywhere.

        • 3w0@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          LXD is to LXC what Podman or Distrobox is to Docker (if I’m correct, it’s just a convenient wrapper that does extra bits/builds on LXC)

          • lengau@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            LXD also has some cool features like launching VMs in a way that’s nearly indistinguishable from containers, which can be useful if you need to do something like run a distro that uses cgroups v1 (e.g. CentOS 7) on a more modern distro.