Kelly: Is there a downside? I’m thinking of people trying to find a parking place, for starters.

Horowitz: So we see that in places that have actually eliminated parking minimums, that we see fewer people driving at all and having cars and we see vehicle miles traveled decrease because people can get around via other mechanisms.

Well, now, would you look at that?! If we change the incentives, if we stop incentivizing driving by law, people change their behavior. In this case, they can save a ton of money by not needing a car.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Less space wasted on parking lots also makes for short distances between places. How about a bicycle? Or… legs?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s just an argument for building infrastructure to support it which isn’t different from what I said. WTF is with the seemingly snarky bicycle or legs comment like I’m against either somehow?

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The infrastructure for walking is actually quite a bit smaller than that for parking cars. The smaller infrastructure might actually allow you to talk from building to building in mere seconds!

        Same for bicycles. Bonus: they don’t smell, don’t pollute, don’t make as much noise, you can carry them when broken, etc

        Cars are handy for long distances, or for heavy loads. Tho you could use a bakfiets for the latter