• ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Counterintuitive” is an understatement. My brain already hurts after reading only the first paragraphs.

    • oDDmON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bulled my way thru a quarter of the article and am exhausted. People actually understand that word salad?

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It helps if you had some of this stuff in college.

        The gist of it is that you want to have your data in many dimensions because that allows you to fit your facts in more easily – but multidimensional data starts behaving in some really counterintuitive ways. For example, data points become harder to distinguish for complicated math reasons.

        That’s really annoying and people doing AI should be mindful of it or their AI ends up underperforming.

        I’m more familiar with the course of dimensionality with respect to clustering (aka looking at a bunch of data points and trying to find groups). Clustering quickly becomes really expensive as your dimensions go up and that can make your entire approach prohibitively expensive.

        Note that the article mentioned doing kNN (k-Nearest-Neighbor, a clustering algorithm) in 700 dimensions, which kinda sounds like a very good reason why training a major AI model takes obscene amounts of resources.

    • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s sounds worse than it is - if you think ‘independent variables’ or just elements in a big vector it’s all a lot easier to get your head around