Theatregoer watches The Comedy of Errors dressed in full latex fetish suit and mask

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Even if a child doesn’t know what a latex suit is or the sexual connotations, it’s still a very scary sight and puts parents in a very uncomfortable position when it comes to explaining to their children what is going on.”

    I mean, if that’s the best complaint they can muster…

    • Hogger85b@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah children young enough not to know probanly.wouldn’t even care, just think the man is wearing a marvel costume or pyjamas or something, rally not hard to say “just what he choose to wear”. It on you if you want to start going into fetish talk with your child

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        “It’s just an extra fancy outfit grown-ups wear.”

        “No you can’t have one.”

        “They don’t do them in your size.”

        “Trust me, I know.”

        “No I won’t be Googling that up.”

        “Because daddy needs to pass a CRB check next month, that’s why.”

  • ImplyingImplications
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some people have feet fetishes but people are still allowed to walk around with their feet out. Some people like armpits and people still show those off. I think just because a group fetishizes something doesn’t mean it needs to be locked away and hidden from children.

    • darvocet@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Tell your child he is a weirdo. Normal people don’t dress as a gimp in public, BUT if that’s what makes you happy then who are we to stop it.

      America as a whole is a bit prudish anyways. People want to walk around in skimpy clothing i dont see any issue with it if genitals are covered.

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        What has America got to do with this?

        I otherwise agree, that parents can just tell the children that the man is a weirdo. Considering that pride parades can have sex toys on display during the middle of the day, I don’t think this even begins to be as provocative as other things we allow.

  • Hol@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You expect them to just keep the gimp locked in the dungeon like some kind of… oh right.

  • clara@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    if you ever go to a place that has strange rules and laws, it’s because of people like this

    like, yes, okay, there’s no rule that said you couldn’t attend a public event in a gimp suit. it doesn’t mean that he had to, did he? 🙄

    i think it’s obvious he’s exploiting the freedom provided to dress in a gimp suit, which freedom you would use to attend a fetish/like-minded event or convention, to then attend something vanilla, where people are definitely not consenting or opting-in to the behaviour.

    sure, it’s legal. but it’s fuckin weird, in the same way that attending in a furry costume would be weird. buying a yard ticket too? he knew what he was doing. if you can afford a fetish suit, you can afford a seat.

    i will say that the moral “think of the children” arguments don’t have any weight in this scenario, because you’re taking those kids to a shakespeare play, lol. i could understand being morally outraged if this loser turned up to wacky warehouse 😄

    • pre@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seats there are so uncomfortable you’re probably better off standing. At least you can move about a bit. Important if you’re in your gimp suit.