I am selfhosting Navidrome for sometimes but its lacks of support for multiple values really bugs me. Since I am having some free time, I’ve decided to write an opensubsonic server in rust (why rust? you guess). The notable features are:

  • In-memory transcoding with ffmpeg c api. Faster transcoding with no ffmpeg binary required and no need for pre-configurated transcoding profile.
  • Multiple values for artists/album artists/etc.
  • Permission models music folder per user.

It is still actively developped and lacks some Opensubsonic features (playlist/starr) and some external integrations like lastfm. However I would like to post it get some feedback about it.

Thank you very much!

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I see. Indeen I gave up teaching people pronounce my name correctly long time ago and told them just to call me by my family name so you coulld pronounce whatever you like. If you know a Vietnamese guy around just ask them to teach you and give them a headache

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              I’m sad that you didn’t take me serious. I looked into the repo got interested and started with the first obvious question. I couldn’t have known that that’s your name. And even now, I still don’t know how to pronounciate it.

    • @zingo
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Hahaha WTF.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    Couple questions,

    Is Rust that much better than Go?

    Would it have been impossible to submit your changes to Navidrome as pull requests?

    Does this import the Navidrome database?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Is Rust that much better than Go?

      IMHO, rust and go are two differents things. The reason I choose Rust is because it is fast and calling C code from rust is supported really well since Rust’s goal is to become a system language. Navidrome is just calling the ffmpeg binary. While in my project, I’ve compiled the neccessary parts of ffmpeg myself (thanks to vcpkg) and call the function directly from Rust. It leads to smaller and fully static final binary (because no ffmpeg bin) as well as faster transcoding time since we don’t have to wait for the ffmpeg binary to finish transcoding the whole file before load the result from the filesystem to the memory.

      Would it have been impossible to submit your changes to Navidrome as pull requests?

      You can see here. This is the biggest reason why I’ve decided to start my own implementation. Beside, I share my server with several friends so I want a mechanism to prevent mixing musics from different people.

      Does this import the Navidrome database?

      This could be a feature request in the future. I could add a python script to import users/songs/playlists/playcount/etc from Navidrome.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Thank you for taking the time to answer. I actually am subscribed to that thread and the upcoming new scanner that fixes that problem. Though now with your new server, you wouldn’t need to worry about that.

        I truly wish you luck though. The more awesome subsonic servers around, the better. I hope your project can be just as much of a household name as Navidrome.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Thank you very much for your kind word! I’ve seen that scanner already but decided to reimplement anyway because I want to choose a different design from the start and have the flexibility to add some new features myself (some kind of ML integration like immich and S3 integration). At worse case, I will still use this so no problems :D

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    This is really cool.

    One thing that I find really helpful is when authors put a sample docker-compose.yml in their repository and link to it from the readme.md. Helps with the initial lift of getting started.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    This sounds like a cool thing. Will it run on FreeBSD? If unknown, I will likely try and find out this weekend.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Here you go. But setting up a testing environment on github actions is too hard so it is built only for now.

      Edit: test is added now

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        Now that’s awfully cool of you 😄. I’ll give that a spin with Symfonium this weekend; much obliged!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    Hey what do you mean by multiple values?

    Eg

    since they support multiple values well enough.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      In the opensubsonic response there will be two fields for artist, one is artistid with only one artist (this is for compatible with old subsonic) and the other is artists with a list of artist ids. The server only sends back the list of artists ids and only these two clients read that field.