Consider the news last week that authorities in several European countries had uncovered a vast corruption network, in which European politicians were paid to spread anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia propaganda. The network, according to intelligence sources cited by Czech media and confirmed by the country’s prime minister, was orchestrated by pro-Russia Ukrainian oligarch Viktor Medvedchuk. Politicians from Germany, France, Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Hungary were allegedly paid directly with cash or through cryptocurrency exchanges.

The idea is to push narratives and policies that help Russia but to mask them behind a local face. (In the aforementioned case, the popular website Voice of Europe was allegedly used to push the propaganda and to facilitate payments.) This provides Russia plausible deniability, but it also makes it more likely that audiences will trust the messages. It serves a purpose within Russia too, as domestic propaganda purportedly showing that people in other countries agree with the Kremlin’s positions.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I definitely cannot name anyone. If Russia is clever enough to turn a good portion of the Republican party, they are definitely 100% clever enough to subtly flip a good number of Democrats too.

    The fact that I can’t name anyone probably says more about what my biases are than anything else.

    Here’s what I found: https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/hillary-clinton-tulsi-gabbard/index.html

    If Hillary can spot it… I dunno. Seems like they’d be up to something.

    If I were Russia, I’d definitely play both sides against the middle!

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree that Russia would try, but I just think they’d have a harder time getting the d’s to be traitors instead of just corrupt. Don’t get me wrong, corruption is terrible in your political leaders, but apparently traitors are a step too far for most of them. Of course you’re going to get a couple here and there, it’s just not a fully saturated thing like the GOP is right now and has been for at least a decade.

      • ɔiƚoxɘup@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I agree with that. My concern is that Democrats have been similarly corrupted or otherwise turned and we just haven’t seen it yet because they’ve got to put forward a certain public face.

        I think it’s just coincidence that the Republicans general ideology kind of lines up with a lot of the ideologies of Russia and that makes it easier for them to fully saturate as you put it.

        Paranoia ain’t no fun.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I think it’s just coincidence that the Republicans general ideology kind of lines up with a lot of the ideologies of Russia and that makes it easier for them to fully saturate as you put it.

          I would put together a list of actual things the r’s have done with russia, but it would take too long, lol. Start with a bunch of them going to russia on the 4th of July and anything those main people did and the people who went along with it. It’s most of them.

          • ɔiƚoxɘup@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Correct. But they weren’t always that way. That’s the point that I was trying to make; that their socially conservative ideology has been an alignment with Russia’s for quite some time. At least the past 40 years I would say.