• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It should be noted that that really only applies to citizens being protected from the government (and primarily was created to protect the printing presses and media from the government). There is no legal precedent to indicate that it would apply between citizens.

    • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      There comes an issue when a private citizen seeks to use the engines of state to punish those whose speech offends them.

      It’s one thing to withdraw society and business from someone who offends you, quite another to demand that the state crush them for you. Of course, most states will do that to a greater or lesser degree. No state extends an absolute freedom of speech.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But all kinds of other laws protect citizens from other citizens. You can’t hurt them, can’t slander them, etcetc so there’s really not much most people can do. The most of it is saying “they did a terrible parody of me” and not deal with them anymore.

    • BlameThePeacock
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      That concept doesn’t really apply very well here.

      The government can’t make laws restricting speech(with very limited exceptions) therefore other citizens can’t legally go after you for protected speech. They’re allowed to tell you you’re an asshole, they’re allowed to ignore you, but they don’t have a court case.