looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don’t run a complaint browser ( cough…firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i’m sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then I will stop browsing them? I stopped using Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit quite easily. I can do it with others if they’re going to go down this route.

      • IonAddis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Internet Explorer tried real hard to do that. Pages were literally built only to run “properly” in IE.

        Curious what round 2 would look like.

        • nintendiator@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In a world that now has stronger cryptography, attestation and surveillance capabilities? I can assure you Round 2 would go vastly different. There would also not be a Round 3.

        • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bank sites don’t necessarily need to want to block ads to implement something like this. They will just see the headlines that say “this is more secure” and that will be enough for them to buy in to it.

      • brockpriv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If my non us bank forces me to use Chrome in order to access my account online, they’re gonna get a call from me