Who would have thought this would have happened?

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      20 is a compromise between what’s actually livable and what employers are willing to pay.

      I agree it’s a stupid number, it should be higher and based off the cost of housing and rate of inflation.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Considering they were living just fine on 16, it’s hard to argue it wasn’t enough. Now they have zero.

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          While that sucks in the moment, ultimately the restaurants will have to hire more staff at the higher pay rate, or ultimately close because they can’t handle the idea of exploiting their workers slightly less.

          Either fast food companies will end up paying the higher wage, or they will end up going out of business. I don’t really care which, because fast food is a luxury. It sucks those people won’t have jobs in the short term, but in the long term they won’t be exploited as much by their next employer.

          If they were “living fine” at $16/hr they wouldn’t need the state to mandate a pay raise. I challenge you to live in California on $16/hr and make it. $20 isn’t even enough, but it’s a move in the right direction.